A new Autodesk and Deloitte Access Economics report places Australia second in the Asia-Pacific for weekly use of construction technology. The ranking is encouraging. The findings behind it are more instructive.
Australia’s construction sector uses more technology, more often, than almost anyone else in the Asia-Pacific region. That is the headline from the State of Digital Adoption in the Construction Industry 2026, a joint report from Autodesk and Deloitte Access Economics released this week.
Forty-eight per cent of Australian construction employees use construction-specific technology on a weekly basis. Only Vietnam, at 52 per cent, ranks higher among the six markets surveyed. The research covered 954 businesses across Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, India, Singapore and Vietnam, including 287 Australian respondents.
Australian businesses now use an average of 7.6 construction technologies, up from 6.9 a year earlier. The three most commonly adopted categories are construction management cloud software at 60 per cent of respondents, construction wearables at 53 per cent, and AI and machine learning tools at 52 per cent.
For an industry that spent years being described as one of the least digitised sectors in the economy, those numbers represent real change. But the report does not treat them as cause for celebration. It uses them as the starting point for a harder conversation.
Adoption is not the same as value
Sumit Oberoi, Senior Manager for Construction Strategy and Partnerships at Autodesk, framed the core problem directly.
“Australia doesn’t have a technology adoption problem. We have a value realisation problem. The opportunity now is to move from digitising tasks to digitising the delivery system.” Sumit Oberoi, Autodesk
That distinction matters. A business that uses one app to issue progress claims, another to manage site documentation, a third to run scheduling, and a fourth for client communication has digitised a collection of tasks. Each tool works in isolation. But nothing is connected, and the business owner still has to manually reconcile information across platforms to understand where any given job actually stands.
A business that has connected those functions into a single workflow, where a variation on site flows through to the schedule, the progress claim, and the client record without anyone having to re-enter the same information, has started digitising the delivery system. That is a fundamentally different outcome, and a fundamentally different return on the technology investment.
The gap between those two positions is where Australian construction sits in 2026. High adoption. Uneven value.
Skills and budget are still the handbrake
Australian respondents identified three main barriers to further technology uptake: a lack of digital skills among employees, limited budgets, and uncertainty about what technical capabilities are required.
The skills point is the most significant. Platforms have become more accessible. Subscription pricing has lowered the upfront cost of entry. The tools that were once available only to large contractors are now within reach of small residential builders.
But availability is not the same as capability. A job management platform that only one person in the business knows how to use properly is not a business system. It is a personal workflow. When that person is on leave, or leaves the business, the system goes with them.
Oberoi described the challenge as a shift from access to capability. The industry has largely solved the access problem. It has not yet solved the capability problem.
For builders, the practical implication is that investment in software needs to be paired with investment in training. Not a one-day onboarding session. Sustained training, with clear expectations about how the whole team uses the tool, and what a properly completed record looks like. That is less exciting than buying a new platform. It is also more likely to produce a return.
Productivity is the reason this matters
The report places the technology conversation inside a broader picture of cost and capacity pressure that will be familiar to anyone running a construction business in Australia right now.
Raw material costs were the most commonly cited barrier to growth across the Asia-Pacific markets surveyed, at 29 per cent of respondents. High labour costs came in at 26 per cent. Australia is among the markets where inflation is forecast to increase further. The industry employs around 1.4 million people, roughly 9 per cent of the national workforce. Forecasts point to a shortfall of 300,000 workers by the middle of next year.
David Rumbens, Partner at Deloitte Access Economics, connected those pressures directly to the technology question.
“Rising input and material costs are placing Australia’s construction industry under intense pressure, squeezing margins and contributing to a growing wave of insolvencies. Lifting productivity through technology is critical, not just for individual businesses, but for the industry’s capacity to deliver Australia’s housing and infrastructure needs.” David Rumbens, Deloitte Access Economics
The logic is straightforward. When margins are thin and labour is scarce, the only lever left is doing more with what you have. Technology that genuinely reduces rework, shortens approval cycles, cuts down time spent chasing information, or eliminates the need to manually re-enter data is a direct productivity gain. In a business running on tight margins, that gain has real dollar value.
The alternative, continuing to run on memory, verbal agreements and disconnected systems in an environment that has become materially more complex, carries a cost that rarely shows up as a line item until something goes wrong.
What a connected data environment actually looks like
The report includes a case study from Icon, a commercial building and construction services provider. Dominic Martens, Group Construction and Technology Manager at Icon, described their approach to project information management in practical terms.
“Our approach has been to push all project data into a single data environment, so teams always know they have the latest information. When site staff can access up-to-date drawings immediately, they can get up and running faster and reduce delays caused by outdated or fragmented data.” Dominic Martens, Icon
That is not a technology story. It is a coordination story. The problem it solves, people on site working from the wrong version of a drawing, is one that has caused expensive rework on construction projects for as long as drawings have existed. A shared data environment does not require a large contractor’s budget or a dedicated technology team. It requires a decision about where information lives and a discipline around keeping it current.
For residential builders, the equivalent is the job management platform that holds the current version of every scope, every variation approval, every progress claim record, and every client communication in one place. The value is not the platform. It is the discipline of using it consistently, so that when a dispute arises, or a client queries a variation, or a subcontractor needs to know what was agreed, the answer is in the system rather than in someone’s memory or inbox.
The builders getting ahead are not using more tools
One of the report’s clearest observations is that the businesses realising the most value from technology are not the ones with the longest list of platforms. They are the ones that have chosen a smaller number of tools and embedded them properly across the whole operation.
That finding echoes what builders working on their own business systems have observed independently. The challenge is not finding software. The market for construction technology is mature enough that good options exist across every function. The challenge is implementation depth. A platform used at 30 per cent of its capability by half the team is not a productivity asset. It is a subscription cost.
Builders who have made the most of their technology investment tend to share a few common habits. They decide upfront what the tool is supposed to measure, and hold the team accountable for keeping it accurate. They pick one platform per function rather than maintaining overlapping systems that create competing records. And they treat the technology plan as a business decision, not an IT decision, because the people who need to change their behaviour are not IT staff. They are project managers, site supervisors and admin teams.
The distinction Oberoi draws, between digitising tasks and digitising the delivery system, is really a description of that gap. Digitising tasks is easy. Any builder can download an app. Digitising the delivery system requires changing how the whole business works, and that is a management challenge that technology alone cannot solve.
What this means for residential builders
The Autodesk and Deloitte report is aimed at the construction sector broadly, and much of the data reflects commercial and infrastructure contractors alongside residential builders. But the core finding applies equally across the industry.
Australia has high technology adoption and uneven value realisation. The businesses that close that gap will not do it by adding more tools. They will do it by using fewer tools more completely, investing in the training and systems that make those tools work across the whole team, and treating technology as infrastructure rather than a subscription that sits in the background.
In a market defined by thin margins, labour constraints, and rising input costs, that kind of operational discipline is not a nice to have. It is one of the few levers still within a builder’s direct control.
The ranking is a useful data point. Second in Asia-Pacific for construction technology adoption is a long way from where the industry was a decade ago. But as the report makes clear, the measure that actually matters is not how many tools are in use. It is what those tools are doing for the business.
The Good Builder Take
High adoption, uneven return. That is where Australian construction sits on technology right now. The builders moving ahead are not buying more software. They are using what they have properly, training the whole team, and connecting workflows that currently run in isolation. If your technology spend is not showing up in less rework, faster claims, or fewer disputes, the problem is probably not the platform. It is the implementation. That is fixable, and it is worth fixing before adding another subscription to the stack.
Listen to The Good Builder Podcast for conversations with builders and operators on the tools and systems shaping the industry.
Your Questions Answered:
How does Australia rank for construction technology adoption?
According to the Autodesk and Deloitte Access Economics State of Digital Adoption in the Construction Industry 2026, Australia ranks second among six Asia-Pacific markets. Forty-eight per cent of Australian construction employees use construction-specific technology on a weekly basis, behind Vietnam at 52 per cent. The survey covered 954 businesses across Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, India, Singapore and Vietnam.
What construction technologies are most commonly used by Australian builders?
The three most widely adopted technology categories among Australian respondents were construction management cloud software at 60 per cent, construction wearables at 53 per cent, and AI and machine learning tools at 52 per cent. Australian businesses use an average of 7.6 construction technologies, up from 6.9 the year prior.
What is stopping Australian construction businesses from getting more value from technology?
The Autodesk and Deloitte report identified three main barriers: a lack of digital skills among employees, limited budgets, and uncertainty about what technical capabilities are required. The core finding is that Australia has a value realisation problem rather than an adoption problem. The tools are widely available, but embedding them into connected workflows across entire teams remains a significant challenge for most businesses.
What does “digitising the delivery system” mean for builders?
Digitising the delivery system means connecting the tools a business uses so that information flows between them without manual re-entry. Rather than separate apps for scheduling, variations, progress claims and client communication, a connected system allows a change on site to flow through to the schedule, the financial record and the client record automatically. This is distinct from digitising individual tasks, which is simply using an app to replace a paper-based step without connecting it to the rest of the business.
How does construction technology help with productivity and insolvency risk?
Deloitte Access Economics has linked improved technology adoption directly to the industry’s capacity to manage cost pressure and reduce insolvency risk. When margins are thin and labour is constrained, tools that reduce rework, eliminate double-handling of information, and speed up the progress claim cycle provide a direct financial return. Businesses that maintain accurate, connected project records are also better positioned to identify margin drift early and manage disputes efficiently before they escalate.
0 Comments