The Australian Constructors Association wants governments to stop treating better workplaces as optional extras. The evidence backs them up.
The construction industry has a workforce problem.
Not just a shortage of numbers. A shortage of people who want to stay.
The Australian Constructors Association (ACA) is making the case that fixing the culture of the industry is inseparable from fixing its workforce pipeline. And they are calling on every Australian government to act.
Their ask is specific. Embed the Construction Industry Culture Standard into procurement processes for major public infrastructure projects. Not as a recommendation. As a requirement.
What the Culture Standard Actually Is
The Culture Standard was developed in close partnership with the NSW and Victorian governments. It sets minimum expectations across three areas: working hours, workforce diversity, and health and wellbeing.
It is not a values statement. It is a set of practical requirements designed to be built into contracts from the start.
The ACT Government has already committed to adopting it. Others are watching.
The ACA argues that without broader adoption, improvement will remain patchy. Some projects will operate to a higher standard. Others will not. And workers will keep voting with their feet.
What the Trials Found
The standard has been tested on real projects, including the Randwick Children’s Hospital Redevelopment in NSW and the Narre Warren to Cranbourne Road Upgrade in Victoria.
The results addressed the concerns most commonly raised against change.
Independent research found no adverse effects on cost or delivery time. The early objections, that better conditions would blow budgets or slow schedules, did not hold up.
What the trials did find was meaningful.
Retention improvements from the standard are estimated to save between $383 million and $771 million annually across NSW and Victoria alone. Female participation on projects implementing the standard reached 32 percent of project staff, compared with the industry average of 24 percent. Projects that moved to a five-day working week reported higher productivity and better worker wellbeing, without added cost or delays.
Those are not marginal gains.
Why Procurement Is the Lever
The ACA is not asking companies to voluntarily improve their culture. It is asking governments to make improvement a condition of doing public work.
This matters because of how the industry is structured.
Major public infrastructure projects set the tempo for large portions of the sector. When governments specify what they expect, those expectations flow through head contractors and into subcontractor relationships. The standard becomes the floor, not the ceiling.
Without that mechanism, progress depends on individual businesses choosing to act. Some will. Many will not, particularly if they are competing for work against operators who have kept costs down by keeping conditions down.
Embedding the standard in procurement removes that competitive disadvantage. It creates a level surface.
The Workforce Argument
The ACA is not framing this as a welfare issue. It is framing it as a supply chain issue.
Australia has significant infrastructure demand ahead of it. Transport, health, energy transition, defence and Olympic infrastructure are all in the pipeline. That work requires people.
The industry already struggles to recruit. It struggles more to retain the people it brings in.
If the working conditions that drive people out of the industry remain unchanged, the workforce shortage does not improve regardless of how many training programs are funded or how many skilled workers are brought in from overseas.
The Culture Standard is being presented as a retention tool as much as a recruitment one.
Where Things Stand
Some jurisdictions have moved. Most have not.
The ACA is calling for national momentum. The argument is that consistent implementation across governments creates a sector-wide shift, rather than pockets of improvement sitting alongside business as usual.
The supporting research and the standard itself are available at cultureinconstruction.com.au.
What This Means for Builders
For builders working on major government contracts, the direction of travel is reasonably clear. Procurement conditions are tightening in other areas, including sustainability, safety and compliance. Culture is moving onto that list.
Understanding what the standard requires, and whether current operations already meet it, is a practical place to start.
For builders thinking about workforce, particularly those finding it harder to hold onto good people, the case being made by the ACA is worth reading. The trial results suggest that better conditions and viable commercial outcomes are not in conflict. They often move together.
The evidence from the trials is now on the table.
The question is whether governments pick it up.
0 Comments