The headlines out of the Central West sweep were about fines. The more useful story is the short list of workmanship defects inspectors are quietly writing up on competent sites.
When Building Commission NSW inspectors walked 10 building sites across the Central West last month, they wrote up 17 separate instances of work that did not meet standard. The offences that grabbed the headlines were the licensing ones. But for builders who already hold the right ticket and do the right thing, the more useful list is the one nobody is talking about: what inspectors are actually finding wrong with the build itself.
Between 22 and 25 June, inspectors ran compliance checks across Orange, Bathurst, Forbes, Parkes, Dubbo, Narromine, Gilgandra and Mudgee. The visit was split into three streams. General site compliance, electrical, and building. The general stream drew the fines. The building stream is where the workmanship story sits, and it is the one worth reading closely if you want to know what a regulator sees when they look at a frame you signed off.
What inspectors actually wrote up
Across 10 building inspections, the Commission recorded 17 instances of non-compliance. Three problems came up most often, and none of them are exotic.
The first was frame and brick overhang exceeding the allowable tolerances. This is the kind of defect that does not announce itself. A frame that sits slightly proud, brickwork that overhangs the slab edge past what the standard permits, and the job keeps moving because it looks close enough. It is close enough right up until it is not, and by then it is lined, clad and hard to fix.
The second was structural steel not being primed correctly. Steel that goes in without the right priming is a corrosion problem waiting for time and moisture to do their work. It is invisible on handover day. It becomes a defect claim years later, long after the trade who cut the corner has moved on and the builder is the one left holding the warranty.
The third was inconsistent thickness in waterproofing applications. Waterproofing is one of the most common sources of defect disputes in the country, and thickness is exactly where it goes wrong. Applied too thin in patches, it passes a visual check and fails under use. The cost of getting it wrong is rarely the membrane. It is the tiling, the flooring and the rectification that follows the leak.
None of these are the work of a cowboy. They are the kind of thing that happens on a competent site under time pressure, when a step gets rushed or a trade is trusted to have done it right without a check. That is precisely why they are worth naming. The fix is not skill. It is verification built into how the site runs.
It is invisible on handover day. It becomes a defect claim years later, long after the trade who cut the corner has moved on.
The part that is easy to miss
Read past the fines and the tolerances and there is a quieter signal in this sweep. The Commission inspected 38 electrical jobs and issued zero notices. On the general stream, most of what drew a caution was signage and paperwork, not dangerous work. The Commissioner’s read on the region was that compliance was high.
That matters, because the story here is not that regional builders are cutting corners. They are not. The story is that even on sites doing well, a handful of standard details are slipping through, and they are the expensive ones to miss. Frame tolerance, steel priming and waterproofing thickness are not obscure. They sit within the same licensing and compliance obligations that every registered builder already carries, covered by the Building Code of Australia and the relevant Australian Standards, and they are checkable before the wall goes up.
Why this is not just a Central West story
It would be easy to file this under regional news and move on. That would be a mistake. Building Commission NSW has made regional inspection a standing part of its work, and it has said more visits are coming to the Central West before the end of the year. The regulator is also running the same three-stream model it used on the North Coast and in the Hunter earlier this year. The pattern is consistent. Metro or regional, the streams are the same and the building stream is the one that catches workmanship.
If you build in New South Wales, the practical takeaway is not to fear the knock on the gate. It is to run your own version of the building inspection before the inspector does. The three defects on this list are a ready-made checklist.
- Check frame and brick alignment against tolerance before you line or clad.
- Confirm structural steel has been primed to spec before it is fixed and covered.
- Verify waterproofing thickness across the whole application, not just where it is easy to see, before tiling starts.
Three checks. All cheap. All far cheaper than the rectification order or the warranty claim that follows when one is skipped.
The seminar nobody mentions
There is one more thing in this sweep that gets buried under the enforcement numbers. Alongside the inspections, the Commission ran a trade seminar in Dubbo, part of an ongoing program that pairs compliance visits with education. These sessions cover the exact areas where builders and trades get caught, and they are run by the regulator itself, for free.
For a builder, that is a straightforward piece of value. The body that will one day inspect your site is telling you, in advance and at no cost, what it looks for. Turning up is one of the cheapest forms of risk management available.
THE GOOD BUILDER TAKE
The headline out of the Central West was fines. The real story is a three-item checklist. Frame and brick tolerance, steel priming, waterproofing thickness. These are not the failures of bad builders. They are the details that slip on good sites when a check gets skipped under pressure, and they are the ones that turn into defect claims and rectification orders long after the job is done.
The builders who come out of this ahead are not the ones who never get inspected. They are the ones who inspect themselves first. The regulator has effectively handed the industry its own defect list. The smart move is to treat it as a pre-check, not a post-mortem.
Frequently asked questions
Between 22 and 25 June 2026, inspectors visited sites across Orange, Bathurst, Forbes, Parkes, Dubbo, Narromine, Gilgandra and Mudgee. From 89 general inspections, 14 fines totalling $11,650 were issued, mostly for unlicensed work, unlicensed contracting and missing builder signage. Across 10 building inspections, 17 instances of non-compliance were recorded.
The three most common building-standard issues were frame and brick overhang exceeding allowable tolerances, structural steel not being primed correctly, and inconsistent thickness in waterproofing applications.
No. Inspectors conducted 38 electrical inspections and issued no notices, which the Commission noted as a strong result for the region.
Yes. Building Commission NSW has confirmed further inspections in the Central West before the end of 2026, as part of an ongoing regional compliance and education program.
Build your own pre-check around the three most common findings: confirm frame and brick alignment against tolerance before lining or cladding, verify structural steel is primed to specification before it is fi
RELATED ARTICLES
NSW compliance blitz results are in
Building Commission NSW blitzes the North Coast
Stay across the regulatory changes and compliance activity shaping construction across Australia. Follow The Good Builder and listen to the podcast for the developments that affect how you run your business.
Last updated: July 2026
This article is intended for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Laws, regulations, and industry requirements vary by state and territory and change over time. Builders and trades professionals should seek independent advice relevant to their specific circumstances before making business, legal, or financial decisions.
Author: TGB Editorial
0 Comments